Message-ID: <16279269.1075855010293.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 16:05:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: michelle.lokay@enron.com
To: kay.miller@enron.com
Subject: RE: FW: expansion agreement
Cc: maria.pavlou@enron.com, steve.harris@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: maria.pavlou@enron.com, steve.harris@enron.com
X-From: Lokay, Michelle </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MLOKAY>
X-To: Miller, Mary Kay </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Notesaddr/cn=59406cf-4a8787c-862566de-280aa>
X-cc: Pavlou, Maria </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Mpavlou>, Harris, Steve </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Notesaddr/cn=22d30c2c-94c2099b-862564f7-51b631>
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \MLOKAY (Non-Privileged)\TW-Commercial Group
X-Origin: Lokay-M
X-FileName: MLOKAY (Non-Privileged).pst

Yes.  For the certificate date, we will be consistent with the executed Western agreement and use March 31, 2002.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Miller, Mary Kay  
Sent:	Tuesday, May 29, 2001 5:56 PM
To:	Lokay, Michelle
Cc:	Pavlou, Maria
Subject:	Re: FW: expansion agreement

I was wondering if we agreed to all of the other changes?  especially a certificate by Dec 2001.  MK


From:	Michelle Lokay/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/29/2001 03:49 PM
To:	Maria Pavlou/ENRON@enronXgate, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:	 

Subject:	FW: expansion agreement

Here are the comments from Oneok.  They have already executed this Privileged & Confidential agreement via fax.  What do you guys think?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	cbulf@oneok.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-cbulf+40oneok+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com] 
Sent:	Tuesday, May 29, 2001 2:23 PM
To:	Lokay, Michelle
Subject:	expansion agreement



I thought I would send you the agreement with the changes I have made - it's
been sent for reviewed and signed by ONEOK and sent via fax to you.(See attached
file: TWAGMT.doc)

 - TWAGMT.doc << File: TWAGMT.doc >> 

